Talk:Pedophile movement/Archive 1

boylover and girllover. They're... hmm... Dicdefs, yeah, that's what they are, and I don't see much of an article coming from them. - Fennec 23:22, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. They both get plenty of Google hits (352K and 11K, respectively), and I can't think of anywhere else that the content might be appropriate. There's room for expansion beyond just a definition, although it would be nice if there were some way to merge the two... -- Seth Ilys
 * Keep. The current discussion of pedophilia struggles to be even one-dimensional. Unless Wikipedia sees itself as a moral arbiter (not likely, given (JOKE, --Patrick 10:03, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)) List of porn stars who sell their underwear on eBay ), both should stay. Denni 01:35, 2004 Mar 30 (UTC)
 * What's with the  Porn stars who sell their underwear on eBay ? - Fennec 01:37, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Fake link. Less baiting than List of porn stars who sell their underwear on eBay . Of course, we could go List of porn stars who sell their underwear on eBay  and just confuse the hell out of everyone. Denni
 * I know that's what it's supposed to be, but why? =D Fennec 14:58, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - I just don't see encyclopedia articles coming from these. -- Cyrius | (talk)  03:27, Mar 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to pedophile or some similar article. Saul Taylor 04:04, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * I agree. Redirect. These appear to be alternative opinions on pedophilia. MK 06:48, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * A little more has been added to the article. About differences according to research. Mike
 * The words doesn't mean the same as pedophiles, so the article is needed. W!
 * Redirect, these are primarily euphemisms used by pedophiles to describe themselves. They should be discussed in pedophilia, but don't warrant separate articles. --Michael Snow 22:16, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * I agree with Michael Snow. These are terms that pedophiles use for themselves. Perhaps they don't act upon their fantasies or perhaps they act on them and consider a child to be consenting in some situations, but it's still pedophilia. --Sonjaaa 17:01, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)
 * Agree to redirect. This is POV and the terms should be discussed in a subheading of the more commonly accepted term pedophilia. Ashibaka &#9998; 20:36, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep both. They appear to be concepts distinct from the purely sexual definition given at paedophilia, so a merge there seems inappropriate. Looks as though there's ample historic and psychological material available on non-sexual attraction to children. Jamesday 15:17, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * (moved from a deleted MediaWiki:VfD-Boylover) Don't delete. Re-direct to boyfriend. 66.32.73.77 17:32, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)