Talk:Pedro I of Kongo

Untitled
I have no idea why this article should be considered nonsense. Please explain it to me. It is written in coherent English prose, as far as I can tell, and has historical content.


 * Yeah, I'm puzzled about the "nonsense" business too, that tag is usually reserved for articles with content like "dwhgk jwhkj wgdhj kgdw" (strangely, some people actually do find the time to create such articles, hence why we have the tag...) I fixed it a little bit and placed a tag as it needs references to outside independent sources (see Wikipedia's verifiability policy) and links to other Wikipedia articles.


 * Two ways to do the links - either as inline citations or, if the source is a major published work or book, just put a references section at the end indicating the book, author, ISBN etc you got the information from or where it can be checked. Orderinchaos 19:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)