Talk:Pedro Proença

Biased article
This article doesn't mention the questionable actions of Pedro Proença in important matches, specially against Benfica. The article also doesn't mention the connections between Proença and F.C. Porto. BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk) 19:08, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sounds like sour grapes to me. – PeeJay 23:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sounds like ignorance to me. BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk) 01:48, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Unless you can prove that Proenca acted improperly in matches involving Benfica, or that he has an improper relationship with Porto, your accusations are highly inappropriate and I suggest you retract them. Ignorance has nothing to do with it. – PeeJay 01:02, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Videos and images are better than words to describe it so if you and anybody else interested in my statement can watch some videos on YouTube by searching for "proença benfica". The most recent video about his robbery is here. Anyway... I won't waste more time trying to prove that this article is biased and doesn't mention any of his scandals against Benfica in favor of FC Porto. :) I also don't want to be banned (Wikipedia's culture of fear) for statements without proper sources in english (most of them are written in portuguese). BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk) 23:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Benfica says goodbye to another championship thanks to Pedro Proença, again. Proença showed 2 red cards against Benfica and didn't want to see a penalty in favor of Benfica. And who gains with this? The same club in the last 30 years: FC Porto, the most corrupt club in history of European football. BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * All I can hear from you is childish complaining. You are obviously biased as well, and I'm sure a neutral fan would have a completely different viewpoint from either you or a Porto fan. Unless you can prove Proenca is corrupt (or at least find some third-party coverage in reliable media to that effect), I suggest you take your pointless bleating elsewhere. – PeeJay 20:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

The question is "how he can prove what everybody can see in images and video ? It is important that when a referee have a public team preference ( F.C.Porto ) can not arbitrate matches against the main rival ( Benfica ). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.142.64.50 (talk) 20:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

There should be a section with "controversies" like every other referee, listing his mistakes in games.--Threeohsix (talk) 11:33, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There would be no space left. :) BenficaNNossaPaixao (talk) 03:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)