Talk:Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Everhartnr


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Lake Marble Falls


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lake Marble Falls

Lead
The first sentence explains what is being discussed further in the page. The information provided is clear and concise.

Content/Organization
There is a good amount of content in each section, such as the fish and wildlife populations. Although, the first sentence in that section is a run on sentence and should be separated into two sentences. There is a reference that does not belong in the section, it should be within the references section.

Tone and Balance
The page is not written in a neutral voice, there's language used throughout that is one-sided. For example using the world "unlike" or "boast", is not necessary when writing/describing a lake. A lake can not boast because it is a place not a person. The information given does not supplement the reader with more information on the actual topic at hand.

Sources and References
As mentioned earlier, there is a source in the wrong section.

Images and Media
Both of the images are captioned and provide a clear picture of where the lake is located. The first image adheres to wikipedia rules, but the second image does not.