Talk:Pell's equation/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: HeartGlow30797 (talk · contribs) 03:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Comments: No MOS issues seen with fractions per MOS:FRAC. Further cmts to be made. Eumat114 (Message) 03:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Quick comment: "compose" triples should not be changed to produce triples, because the sentence is talking about combining two triples to get new ones. Compare the other usages at Composition. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:15, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Two points with regards to the comments in 1(a):
 * "Brahmagupta solved many Pell equations with this method; in particular he showed how to obtain solutions..." I'm not like the word "in particular". We could replace it with "...this method by showing how to obtain..." &mdash; In fact I think this sentence is better as is;
 * "(sequence A001081 (x) and A001080 (y) in OEIS)." Provide a citation instead of putting it in parentheses. Do the same to all others. &mdash; The article is using the OEIS link template: Template:OEIS link, which is best practice.
 * And one wrt. point 3(b): rather than recommending shortnening, which is a difficult editorial instruction, I'm inclined to think you should identify a passage that you think would better be in another article and suggest a better home for the material. The point of WP:SUMMARY is not to have deprive readers of technical content, but rather to ensure that the material we have is digestable. (This is a shallow response to the review. I'm going to look over the article more carefully.) &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 11:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Passed :D  Heart  Glow (talk) 10:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)