Talk:Pells Pool

CorenSearchBot
The history section of this article was based on http://www.pellspool.org.uk/history.htm. The text has been hacked back to basics and completely revised to bear no similarity whatsoever to the pellspool.org.uk website.—Speedoguy (talk) 16:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Continued similarity
This article still constitutes a copyright violation of the original source, as a derivative work. Consider the following paragraph from the article:

The source says:

Perhaps seeing these side by side, with some unused material removed, can make a little more clear potential concerns with abridgment. You have runs of duplicate text and precisely the same syntax in some sections.

This particular problem was pointed out on November 14th, but no steps have yet been taken to correct it.

The article needs to be rewritten so that it does not infringe on the language or syntax of the original. If it is not rewritten soon (or permission not verified), it will be necessary to blank it and list it at WP:CP. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Phrasing re-worked to avoid any partial derivative phraseology. Remaining common phrases such as "extended indefinitely" are common expressions and idioms.—Speedoguy (talk) 15:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Grade II Listed
It has been added to this category but I cannot currently find a reliable source stating this is true.—Speedoguy (talk) 16:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The List I use is UK Parliament Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport, Minutes of Evidence January 2002. Maybe add this to List of sources on lidos--Lidos (talk) 16:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)