Talk:Pelvis

The male/female dichotomy presented in this article is false
The drawings presented are 120 years old, and were based on assumptions, not fact. They are exaggerations to present a binary cissexist fantasy as reality. This article makes bold claims about evolution and a sex binary that has zero basis in reality, zero evidence, and zero scientific validity. This entire article is mostly wrong and should probably we rewritten from scratch. 89.247.174.133 (talk) 01:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

What about monotremes?
Is In mammals, the bony pelvis has a gap in the middle, significantly larger in females than in males. (last paragraph of the lede) also true of monotremes? If so, the next sentence should have "or eggs" added after "offspring". Otherwise, maybe qualify "mammals". The Crab Who Played With The Sea (talk) 02:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)