Talk:Pendock Church

Merge proposal
I think this page should be merged with the Pendock page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dadge (talk • contribs) 14:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You could post a RfC here. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose. The church is itself sufficiently notable to merit a stand-alone article; and this is in any case common practice. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 21:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I know the article on the village itself is a bit brief, but I feel any Grade I listed building deserves its own article. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pendock Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719032703/http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/catalogue/adsdata/arch-769-1/ahds/dissemination/pdf/vol34/34_097_121.pdf to http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/catalogue/adsdata/arch-769-1/ahds/dissemination/pdf/vol34/34_097_121.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Pendock Church.jpg