Talk:Peniophora quercina/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  02:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Reviewing  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  02:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Just need a mycomorph, and I'll pass! Very nice job :)  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  06:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * This is a case which, in many ways, reveals the limits of the mycomorphobox, which is designed specifically for mushrooms. I appreciate that there isn't a picture at this time, but the species looks like this, and so much of the box isn't applicable. I've added one- I suppose it adds a little visual interest to the page. Thanks for the review! J Milburn (talk) 10:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass!  Rcej (Robert) –  talk  04:31, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Peniophora quercina passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: