Talk:Pennsylvania Route 152/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 11:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

I'll review this article over the next couple of days.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Nice article overall. It meets all GA criteria really, prose is of fine quality and neutrally written, supported by appropriate references. The article is stable and all images used in the article have appropriate licenses. Still, I think that a map of the route would be very useful to readers, so could you please provide one - at least an OSM map to help readers better place the route?--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Maps are not required at GAN. However, I did put a request for one at WP:USRD/MTF/R. However, the task force has been dead as of lately. There is also KML data that provides a map of the route.  Dough 48  72  16:33, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Good work!--Tomobe03 (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)