Talk:Pennsylvania Route 21/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * PA highways, is this a WP:RS? Also, could you use an actual direct link for the Google Map, and possibly use the cite map template for citation?
 * The PA highways site is used for a lot of Pennsylvania highway articles, so I figured it was reliable. Check it out and let me know if it'll work.  If not I'll find something better.  I'll work on the map links. Deigo (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Check the WP:RS noticeboard, and if they give it the green light, give me the perm link to the approval -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 14:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Someone said "maybe" Reliable sources/Noticeboard. It's on the bottom. Deigo (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Please address the reference issues. On hold. -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 04:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Pass -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 03:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Please address the reference issues. On hold. -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 04:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Pass -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 03:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Pass -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 03:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)