Talk:Pennsylvania Route 222

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of July 3, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: The article is well written with correct spelling and proper grammar usage. The red-link to Cedar Creek Park should probably be removed if the park is not notable however.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Article is factually accurate.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Yes, covers all major points including the history and description of the road.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Written in an neutral point of view.
 * 5. Article stability? Very stable. No edit wars and little vandalism.
 * 6. Images?: Contains diagrams and maps which is enough for the article although an actual picture of the route may be helpful.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — --Hdt83 Chat 19:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)