Talk:Penny Brohn UK

I think your topic is really solid and specific and I think you have a really good opportunity here to fill a niche. I would love to see more about the current programs and the current status of the Centre! In terms of structure, I feel that it might be beneficial to have an additional section highlighting the Center's relevance in its field (i.e. has it worked with other centers, other hospitals, why is it unique?) or even just to include that further in your introductory paragraph. Overall I think it's looking really good & I can't wait to read more going forward! KCbo2784 (talk) 16:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Randy, your article looks very clearly structured and I can totally envision what your article will look like once it is finished! I honestly think that you have all the sections needed!Terrypyx (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Just one problem with this article. I cannot find any reference online to the role that Catherine Zollman played in discrediting the Chilvers report - all the online accounts I can find refer to the reactions of patients and the work of I Bourke and H Goodare Newhaven lad (talk) 17:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)