Talk:Pentaamminenitritocobalt(III) chloride

Group #4
Review #1 Matt Kleinjan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkleinjan (talk • contribs) 07:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC) This article is very well written and has a lot of solid information. I like the fact that you discuss about the isomer, however, I would suggest simplifying the explanation of the connectivity of the isomer in the introduction. It gets a little confusing and it’s a bit much for an introduction section so it might be better to make it more like your first sentence in the isomer section. In the preparation section I would suggest writing out the overall reaction for every step that you discuss. It’ll help people get a better understanding of what each step does. Finally, you should try and add more information to the chembox. Otherwise everything else looks great, you have a good list of references and you explain things very well.

Mkleinjan (talk) 22:43, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #2 Katie McEvoy This article contains a lot of descriptive information on the chemical. Adding information about UV-Vis spectrophotometry shows that you went into good detail and did your research. I would suggest explaining what the absorbance maxima mean in terms of determining the structure of the isomer. I would also suggest showing the mechanism for the preparation of this chemical. This would help readers better understand how the chemical is formed and what would need to be done during the synthesis experiment. I can tell you did your research while writing, and it really increases the quality of the page. Good job! Mcevoykt (talk) 02:32, 2 November 2012 (UTC) Review #3 Cathleen Cahill This article is very well developed, well written and info packed. I really like how you talk about the different isomers and how to distinguish between them. I can tell you are knowledgeable about your compound. I would suggest defining a structural isomer for people reading this article who are not familiar. Also, I would suggest adding melting point into your chem box. I like how you included hazards into your chem box. This is a well done article. Cmcahil2 (talk)173.15.30.142 (talk) 05:53, 2 November 2012 (UTC)