Talk:Pentalytics

Freestanding article doesn't meet Wikipedia guidelines
This article was built from material spun off from Daniel Harple, but it doesn't meet the criteria for a free-standing article. Web searches (web, books, scholar) yield no independent coverage: this model hasn't achieved notability. The sources in the article are all: Dan Harple talking about himself; about the MOBI initiative that his own group co-founded, with only one mention of Pentalytics between the two of them; and coverage by Berklee people about the use of the approach at Berklee.

In addition, the tone of this article conveys a sense of praise for the model that violates WP:NPOV.

I'm going to redirect this back to Daniel Harple and restore the content that was removed there. Largoplazo (talk) 17:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)