Talk:Pentaphenylphosphorus

eyecancer
Jeeez... the new layout is pure unrefined eyecancer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C7:1F2D:9840:E819:61E:978B:EA93 (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

add: Whoever came up with this idea should read a book on a screen like this... ...and then get fired. -> https://ibb.co/t8wRKjJ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C7:1F2D:9840:E819:61E:978B:EA93 (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You are not the only one complaining about the new style. And there is pressure to roll back the change. If the Wikimedia foundation won't cooperate, It may get an English Wikipedia override to improve. I see the style wasting half the screen space. Why I don't get the problem is that I registered and then set my skin to MonoBook. To see this page as you used to use this url: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pentaphenylphosphorus&useskin=vector or as I see it https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pentaphenylphosphorus&useskin=monobook . If you register and log on you can even make your own stylesheet to rearrange screen elements how you like. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

not a cation
It is a neutral compound, but the infobox on the right redirects towards "other cations", such as all the isoelectric related pentaphenylpnictogens, which are also not cations. Any way to change the infobox ? 137.222.42.24 (talk) 09:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * That does not mean that the molecule is a cation, but that the element is substituted by another cation-like element. (ie +ve oxidation state). An alternative is to use related compounds box. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)