Talk:People's Liberation Armed Forces

Valid topic, but the current entry contains no useful information, and is POV. Delete, or rewrite from scratch. -- Chris 73 | Talk 01:33, 5 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Current article is junk. Delete unless rewritten. -- Cyrius|&#9998 03:30, May 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Viet Cong. SWAdair | Talk  04:27, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per SWAdair's comment above. TB 08:40, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rambo. Kidding... Redirect to Viet Cong as suggested above. Alcarillo 13:44, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Redir to Viet Cong. Agree current article is junk. Even having been heavily involved in the debate at the time, I'd never heard the term. Very interesting. I even wonder if the Viet Cong article mightn't really belong here, and become the redir itself? Andrewa 02:56, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect for now, then create as a stand alone article when somebody original neutral offers treatment as considerate of the subject as that in MSN Encarta. To permanently refuse a VC PLA Army article would be nationalist POV. SimBot2 17:23, 10 May 2004 (UTC)