Talk:Percy Anderson (designer)

Bot-created subpage
A subpage at Percy Anderson/fjc was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 12:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Requested move 25 August 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. There is consensus for the article to move to Percy Anderson (designer), with creation of a disambiguation page at Percy Anderson. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jack Frost (talk) 08:26, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Percy Anderson → Percy Anderson (artist) – I can't see how this is PRIMARYTOPIC as opposed to Percy Anderson (judge). Here are the pageviews. In my opinion, there is no PRIMARY and so a DAB page should be created at the base name.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 11:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Comment do you have any opinion on artist vs designer? Also, disambiguating links to the disambiguation page created by such a move is actually exceptionally easy (see User:Qwertyytrewqqwerty/DisamAssist) and I'll happily take care of that. Only in cases of a primary topic swap would this complicate the matter and be an additional consideration. Lennart97 (talk) 13:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose. However, if *Since* someone commits to change all the links to it in all the articles, I would withdraw this. Also, should it be (artist) or (designer)? -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:52, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nom, DAB at base name.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Provisional support, conditional on the mover's undertaking to make sure that all the links in the fifty-something articles that point here are changed to link to the retitled page. Otherwise oppose. I agree with Ssilvers that "designer" might be preferable to "artist".  Tim riley  talk   14:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Support per nomination and Ortizesp. The artist/designer is not the primary topic. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong support the judge gets 32,434 and Anderson gets 871 compared with only 9,350 for this one.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 09:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No preference on artist and designer, although I reckon designer might make more sense since that seems to be what he's best known for.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Not really though they appear to be better known as a designer as far as I can see.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 16:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No preference. I figured artist was more generic term so I went with it in the nom just to be safe.  Bait30   Talk 2 me pls? 22:05, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Good. Happy with a move in that case. Designer would be decidedly preferable to artist.  Tim riley  talk   15:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I also think designer is a better choice. -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)