Talk:Percy Henn

GA nom
This one isn't quite up to GA standards yet, see my peer review for reasoning.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 16:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know who assessed this but there is no way it is up to B-class, more like start.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 01:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Reverted pending discussion. My understanding is that Henn is a fairly obscure figure for which little information is available. Thus, even though the article is short, everything seems to have been covered, and there are no key elements missing. I should think it would prove useful to the majority to people visiting in search of information on Henn. Hence B would seem most appropriate per WikiProject Australia/Assessment. Hesperian 02:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 08:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

legacy
There's a Henn close in Winthrop, Western Australia since winthrop is associated with UWA I wonder whether HEnn close is named after Percy Henn. The question is where to find such information to provide a cite for its inclusion in the article. Gnangarra 08:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I guess there would be a source in the UWA library... Seventy dot 03:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

GA
Feel free to resubmit it if you think it qualifies. I don't review the same articles twice, see what someone else thinks.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Though I must say the concerns I noted were more the enough reason to fail it, GA criteria 1 is "well written" and GA criteria 4 is NPOV, both of which were concerns I noted on my peer review. I would definitely address those if I were the one resubmitting it, just my two cents.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * When I reviewed the GACriteria, I didn't think NPOV was a problem... but I'm looking for any suggestion. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Those weasel words was all I noted...anyway, on that, mostly the prose was my concern, I have made a couple additional notes on the peer review. Like I said I won't be the one reviewing it next time (because I thnk articles get better and better the more eyes that look at them) but I am willing to point out anything I notice, I won't mess with geographic locales, promise, I'll just mention if something is confusing here or on the review page. : )A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

GA Resubmission
I am relisting the article for GA review. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Version 0.7
This article falls outside the scope of this next release. However, it will be automatically considered for later, larger releases. Walkerma 04:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Automated peer review 1
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Auroranorth (!) 10:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
 * If this article is about a person, please add  along with the required parameters to the article - see Persondata for more information.[?]
 * Per Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called  ==The Biography== , it should be changed to  ==Biography== .[?]
 * As per Manual of Style (headings), please do not link words in headings.[?]
 * Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Guide to layout.[?]
 * This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
 * OK, I have completed the suggestions shown here. Auroranorth (!) 10:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

GAR
This article is being brought to WP:GAR. Auroranorth (!) 11:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Good Article: pass
It meets the criteria so it gets a pass, but there are a two things I would like to see work on: Good job. Let me know if there are any problems or questions. Dylan (talk) 05:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Grammatical and MoS errors. I corrected as many as I saw going through, but keep an eye out for proper formatting and writing in this article.
 * It is a very short article. It doesn't appear to omit anything major, but I would definitely like to see more detailed content.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Percy Henn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829181636/http://www.ccgs.wa.edu.au/newsite/page/body/news_cal/content/feature/feature24/text/text.html to http://www.ccgs.wa.edu.au/newsite/page/body/news_cal/content/feature/feature24/text/text.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)