Talk:Performance-related pay

Merger proposal
I suggest merging the other article here, as it seems to cover the same topic, but far more links point here. --Langec (talk) 13:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with merging P4P into this article. Go ahead whenever. Ryanjo (talk) 23:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

DominicConnor (talk) I'm vaguely against this, especially in the light of current events around banking bonuses. Pay for performance to me includes the idea of piece work, where in a simple case you pay is number of things made * rate, but bonuses cover cases where an employee may be on a fixed rate of salary plus an extra amount that may not exactly be defined, and in any case is independent of the base.

Although both articles could be on the same page, I worry that too much of the article would be spent explaining differences like this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DominicConnor (talk • contribs) 17:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

GUYS THIS IS REALLY UNBALANCED JUST LOOK AT THE 'RESEARCH QUESTION' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.184.165 (talk) 19:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Migheli's comment on this article
Dr. Migheli has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

"Good article. However it does not cite the gender differences that are often recorded in this field."

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

We believe Dr. Migheli has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:


 * Reference: Migheli, Matteo, 2010. "Gender at work: Productivity and incentives," POLIS Working Papers 142, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)