Talk:Periodismo para todos

Added "Too Few Opinions Tag"
After pointing out that the show is also considered yellow journalism in addition to investigative reporting, I added this tag because more is needed about this aspect of the program. Sushilover2000 (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Rolling Stone
Rolling Stone is a news magazine and a valid reference. Sushilover2000 (talk) 05:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Rolling Stone is a music magazine. It is a valid reference... for the articles about Fito Páez or Charly García. Their opinion of political TV programs is irrelevant Cambalachero (talk) 13:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Rolling Stone covers lots of topics from Music to Politics. Certainly, an opinion about a TV show (=entertainment) is within their relevant expertise. I re-added the "Too Few Opinions Tag" again after you removed it. Sushilover2000 (talk) 20:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It's still a music magazine, and their opinion on political topics has very little significance. Can you mention a source specialized in political information, without a conflict of interest with either the program or the government, that says the same thing? Cambalachero (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I refer you to Wikipedia's page on Rolling Stone: "Rolling Stone is a magazine published every two weeks that focuses on politics and popular culture". Clearly, a TV show such as PPT is within their expertise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushilover2000 (talk • contribs) 08:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Again: Can you mention a source specialized in political information, without a conflict of interest with either the program or the government, that says the same thing? Cambalachero (talk) 00:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)