Talk:Perisynaptic schwann cells

Untitled
1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 1, meets size requirement, but no history before Nov 19th.

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 2

5. Links: 1, a couple more terms could have links

6. Responsive to comments: 2 (none to respond)

7. Formatting: 2

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 2 _______________ Total:     18  out of 20

Laura McKenzie (talk) 16:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

1. Quality of Information: 2 – great background information, well described.

2. Article size:2 15,000+

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs:2- 10

5. Links: 2 – large amount of links used

6. Responsive to comments:2

7. Formatting:2

8. Writing:2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2 ( used name)

10. Outstanding?:2 great article _______________ Total:   20    out of 20

P J McGill (talk) 19:35, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 2

3. Readability: 2

4. Refs: 2

5. Links: 2

6. Responsive to comments: 1- fix naming as tagged from sandbox

7. Formatting: 2

8. Writing: 2

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2

10. Outstanding?: 2 _______________ Total:  19     out of 20

AllisonMaloney (talk) 03:50, 26 November 2013 (UTC)