Talk:Perkin Warbeck

Comment
The date of his confession is clearly incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.25.30.54 (talk) 13:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Monarchy abolished?
Why does the infobox on this page currently claim "Monarchy abolished" in 1485 ?Eregli bob (talk) 17:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, good question - I suspect the infobox can't cope with a pretender where the monarchy is continuing. DuncanHill (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well spotted! I've dealt with this.Butcherscross (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

And where was the court of Burgundy in 1490?
In the Netherlands? Ghent perhaps? Because the duchy of Burgundy was under French rule for good since 1477 and the Free County the same up to the mid-1490s. Dijon was no longer the Burgundian capital. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Allegedly?
At the moment we have this in the "Imprisonment and death" section: "Allegedly, the two tried to escape in 1499." I always find allegedly a weird thing to stumble over in Wikipedia and perhaps even more so in a historical article. It seems like it might be a bit of a shorthand or cop-out. Who is alleging this? Is it sourced? It just seems ... odd. If you take away "allegedly" then you end up with a simple sentence that should be in or out, depending on whether it has an RS or not. Similarly, if what we mean is "According to the near-contemporary account of Sir Fred Smith the two tried to escape in 1499" then we should say it, and again it needs an RS for where Fred is quoted alleging this. Ahem, or not. But the current version just seems a bit ... hmmmmm. Or is it just me? Cheers 138.37.199.206 (talk) 13:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, WP:ALLEGED helps a bit here. (It doesn't like it.) :) 138.37.199.206 (talk) 13:12, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I've taken out the inappropriate (I'm trying to be polite here!) "allegedly" and made it into a simple statement - which is challenged by the "unreffed" tag I've also added... hmmm. Best wishes to all 138.37.199.206 (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Burial ?
Do records exist of a place of burial ? Given the recent rediscovery and identification of Richard III, the true identity of "Warbeck" could be established if his bones could be located. RGCorris (talk) 15:22, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 02:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

"Peter Ure" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_Ure&redirect=no Peter Ure] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2023 (UTC)