Talk:Permanand Mohan

No claim of notability?
Isn't chief examiner for CAPE and a Fulbright award an assertion of notability? Guettarda 13:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * With 250,000 people having received a Fulbright Scholarship I should say that we can rule that out as a claim of notability. As far as chief examiner for an exam council, I'm not so sure.  I tried reviewing Notability (people) and Notability (academics), but I can't really see how this person would be notable.  The way I suppose they could claim notability was the following:


 * "The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field"


 * Is it possible to get sources to point to anything that would make this apparent? Is there some other way this person fulfills Notability (people)?  Sparsefarce 17:38, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Winning a Fulbright is still an assertion of notability - it isn't trivial to get a Fulbright award. As for the CAPE thing - it's recognition of being a leading figure in your field.  CAPE is a revolutionary change, so anyone involved is making a contribution which is changing education in the Caribbean.  I don't know how Mohan is exacly involved, but it's a pretty big assertion of national and international notability.  Guettarda 18:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Considering that the prod tag was removed, this belongs at AfD and not on prod--see WP:PROD. NickelShoe (Talk) 04:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, it was prod'd when it was a one-line stub; it was reasonable to remove the prod tag once it was expanded to something substantial. Guettarda 14:03, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It's the re-adding of the prod tag that's improper, not the removing of it. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)