Talk:Permeable reactive barrier

Feedback
I saw a request for feedback at WP:FEED. Here are my recommendations. I didn't get down the article all the way but that's all the time I have for now. Thanks. Jesanj (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Uncapitalize the section headings as is done here (see "Page names that only differ by capitalization").
 * 2) Replace "emerging" in the WP:LEAD with something more specific.
 * 3) In the history section, instead of saying they were "removed" and it was a "success", can you please be specific as to what % was captured and what kind of "success" it was? With sources?
 * 4) Do sources really call barriers which sequester contaminants PRBs (which would be a misnomer in my mind, but that would be the sources problem, not ours)?
 * 5) Was the first application a reaction? If so what was the efficiency?
 * 6) Is anything "entirely harmless". I doubt it. Try non-toxic or something else used in a reliable source please.
 * 7) Split reactive processes and reactive materials into separate sections please.
 * 8) That "many" (implying most) environmental pollutants are reduced needs sourcing. The historical case was oxidized.