Talk:Pernicious

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Move. Discussion on how best to handle the article can continue below. Cúchullain t/ c 03:43, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Article only contains soft redirect to wiktionary, disambiguation here is not needed. BOVINEBOY 2008 00:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment that's a new unreviewed article, for an unreleased film, does it meet notability? From the current contents, it's a candidate for speedy deletion, having no mention of notability. It also has an April 2015 release date, so probably is a WP:TOOSOON. -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 06:05, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose the film article should be moved to Draft:Pernicious (film) per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NOTABILITY and WP:FFILM -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 06:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I have rearranged page Pernicious as a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. The notability and citations issues should be resolved first before any such page move. Otherwise it is a pointless exercise if this article is eventually only going to get deleted. Zzyzx11 (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Support - whether or not it is deleted is irrelevant at a WP:RM discussion, and I have no opinion on that. However, up to now I don't see that anyone has indeed nominated it for deletion. As the only use of the term on Wikipedia, this is a straightforward move. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 21:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * We can decide to incubate it instead. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 08:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Support - and the "disambiguation page" should be speedily deleted. Red Slash 04:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment "Pernicious" would be the adjective form for perniciousness ; WP:ADJECTIVE would suggest that if the noun-form is more likely then the adjective form should redirect to the noun-form, and a hatnote added there for other uses of the adjective form. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.