Talk:Perry Kivolowitz


 * The page appears to have been written by the author himself. It reads more like a media release or puff piece and appears to contain significant amounts of original research. Whether the subject is notable enough to justify his own page is a question worth answering but I am less familiar with those guidelines so leave it up to others.

208.90.214.194 (talk) 23:38, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Please identify which of the statements made in this 9 year old article is not factual and supported by references. Please expand on "appears to contain." Please identify yourself and on what basis you believe this article's subject does not meet notability especially given your admission that you are not familiar with the appropriate guidelines.

Cheers. Pkivolowitz (talk) 20:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)