Talk:Perry the Platypus/GA1


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * I fixed a few spelling errors RJFJR (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * It has extensive references
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * Seems sufficiently complete without excessive digression
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Looks OK on NPOV to me.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * Reasonable stable (most recent changes were by me fixing spelling RJFJR (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC))
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * 4 images: 3 drawings have fair use reasons attached, last is a photo (at commons) with an 'own work' status.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass RJFJR (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review!  The Flash  {talk} 18:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * 4 images: 3 drawings have fair use reasons attached, last is a photo (at commons) with an 'own work' status.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass RJFJR (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review!  The Flash  {talk} 18:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review!  The Flash  {talk} 18:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review!  The Flash  {talk} 18:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)