Talk:Perseus (constellation)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Astrocog (talk · contribs) 15:31, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Starting review - please be patient.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * No problems here. Article is readable, with no glaring prose errors.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * Citations are well-done here. Excellent formatting.
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * Thorough referencing in this article.
 * C. No original research:
 * None that I could discern.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * Hits the broad highlights
 * B. Focused:
 * No unnecessary tangents. Focused on the constellation and its stars/objects.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Seems to be fine. I checked into the claim on the talk page that the Staal reference is unreliable vis-a-vis Chinese lore, but I can find no supporting evidence for the claim. Should that issue resurface with good evidence, then that section should be revisited.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Though some content (about 5K worth) was added this month, I think this article is still relatively stable. No evidence of edit wars.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All images are fine.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * I added some alt text to images myself, which satisfies me on this requirement.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Quite a good article, and on its way to becoming FA class.
 * Quite a good article, and on its way to becoming FA class.