Talk:Perseverance-class frigate/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 11:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The 18-pounder link in the lead goes to a WWI gun, do you mean 18-pounder long gun?
 * Yes, oops!


 * "leaving more space than was often found to operate them in." - I've read this three times and I'm not entirely sure what this is trying to indicate - can it be rephrased for clarify?
 * Rewritten


 * " The ships would in later years be classified as 42-gun frigates." - was this a reclassification on paper, a change in armament, or both
 * Just the navy deciding to count more of the guns that were already there


 * "By 1800 the majority of British frigates were of a size with the ships of other nations" - is this missing a word?
 * No, but clarified


 * The lead directly states that the 1808 order was an accident, but this is relegated to a footnote in the main body. If it's significant enough to warrant inclusion in the lead, I would say it should probably be in the main text of the body as well
 * Done


 * "nd their crew complement was set slightly lower than the original iteration of the class; at 260," - I thought that was what the original iterations of the class had for the crew, as that was the original figure and the 270 was with later adjustments
 * The later adjustment was a year before the first ship of the class was even launched, no ship of the original iteration actually went to sea with that number (on paper!)


 * I did a couple source spot-checks, no issues
 * File:Grand Port mg6981.jpg needs a PD tag for the underlying work of the painting
 * Have..hopefully..added the correct thing


 * Image licensing otherwise looks fine, sources are reliable for what they are citing

I think that's it from me for this one, good work. Hog Farm Talk 19:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the review! I've replied to your comments. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)