Talk:Persona 4/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 21:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC) Overall, a fairly good article. I have some questions and comments before passing. Further comments as I see them. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 21:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Citations should be formatted consistently; for example, 1UP is linked as 1UP.com, then 1up.com. Some refs are missing work/publisher info, while some web publications are italicized while others aren't.
 * What makes Siliconera a reliable source?
 * Improper/changing tense throughout the article. For example, parts of the reception section say "Famitsu points out that" and then "IGN labeled Persona 4". Gameplay is present and continuous, development/reception is past.
 * "While "ideas [had been] thrown around earlier", development on Persona 4 in Japan did not begin until after the release of Persona 3." Whose quotes are these thrown around in development?
 * "Outside of key events, the Protagonist attends school," Why is it referred to as capitalized Protagonist?
 * The Synopsis section is weighted fairly heavily, and could be trimmed a bit. The information about setting is best placed in with development, as it interferes with plot comprehension.
 * Moved the development pieces to the Development sections, and I believe it was the director quoted as saying those. That's all I could work out, I'll pour over the rest as soon as possible. &mdash; Blue. 12:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * As there's still work to be done and the article has been on hold for a long time already, I'm failing the nomination as it stands. Please address all the above issues before renominating. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 17:21, 24 April 2010 (UTC)