Talk:Persona 4/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SCB &#39;92 (talk) 16:36, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

SCB &#39;92 (talk) 16:36, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review.
 * About the merchandise subsection, I think as far as Persona 4's merchandise coverage is concerned, those are all that are covered by online media. I could use some tips on what to work on the merchandise subsection if the concern is expansion.
 * Just for my convenience, the Gameplay section's first paragraph can be cited from the earlier sources. For the character paragraph, we'll need in-game citations.
 * For clarification, the edit war in question was actually vandalism.
 * Due to the nature of my work, I can only focus on fixing the article after two days. Hope I will be here in time. &mdash; Blue. 17:31, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I got some new complaints: like the previous reviewer pointed out, in the references section, some web publications are italicized while others aren't. A good example is when Wired is not italicized in ref 47, but italicized in ref 62; remove the italicization of the publishers in the refs: Kotaku.com, Computer Entertainment Suppliers Association (CESA), Edge-online.com, Wired; also ref 56 has to get rid of the "GameTrailers = 9.3/10" and have a retrieval date and publisher, and ref 54 has to have a retrievel date and publisher too. For the merchandise subsection, I suggest a mention of the Persona 4 guides, Persona Club P4, Official Design Works, the Izanagi and Jiraiya plush dolls, and possibly the Social Link expansion pack, PERSONA 4 Cell Phone Strap and Persona 4 tarot cards—SCB &#39;92 (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't understand.... should I italicize the web publications, or should I remove them altogether? &mdash; Blue. 17:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

remove the italicization altogether—SCB &#39;92 (talk) 18:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Can I get more clarification there because some like Wired are italicized in their article, if youre saying I should remove all the italics, the template seems to be doing that automatically. &mdash; Blue. 07:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

actually, leave the italics in the magazine publishers in the sources; I'll make the minor changes myself, then give it a GA status——SCB &#39;92 (talk) 13:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Now that the references are consistent, I've given this article a GA status; good job Bluerfn for making this article achieve this status, and I'd encourage you to review a GA-nominated article yourself, preferably a video game article that is up for GA-nomination like Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars; again good job and keep up the good work—SCB &#39;92 (talk) 14:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your cooperation and contributions. It means a lot to me. I'd review a GA nominee when I have the confidence. &mdash; Blue. 02:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)