Talk:Personalis

Redirect vs Disambig
Personalis is just a Latin word that can refer to multiple things, why are we redirecting this to a specific title in Hungary which no longer exists? - Indefensible (talk) 20:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary. However, there is a a mechanism for getting rid of or changing redirects that you don't like or think are flawed.  Occasionally, the consensus will be a soft redirect, for example to Wiktionary.  Your attempt to create a DAB page was a non-starter on several fronts, not least because DAB pages exist solely to allow readers to choose between multiple articles that may be intended by an ambiguous term, and so by definition they need to include multiple Wikipedia articles that may be intended by the ambiguous term.  Not a (external link to a) dictionary definition, an article that the term could reasonably have intended, and a redlink (ie. not an article).  If there was even one other possible article, you would usually want to keep the redirect and use a hatnote to link directly to the alternative article.  Lithopsian (talk) 20:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Personalis, Inc. probably should have at least its own company stub article, I can work on that or someone else can. But main point is the Latin word "personalis" should not just redirect to an obsolete Hungarian title, it shows the failure of Wikipedia to have encyclopedic depth of coverage. - Indefensible (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)