Talk:Perspective-n-Point

MQR (talk) 13:10, 26 October 2016 (UTC)Is there any interest in incorporating any of the material discussed at http://www.mqrieck.com/P3P/P3P_Solutions.html ? All of this is supported by peer-reviewed published articles (mostly in JMIV). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrieck (talk • contribs) 13:07, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The information at the link you have posted definitely expands on the discussion of the choice of control points for the P3P problem; however, solutions to the general case of the PnP problem are what I'm more interested in. This is still an open problem in the Computer Vision community with work done for 4 or more control points that made its way into CVPR 2016. As this page is dedicated to the full problem, I think we should focus on solutions for 4 or more control points that are presented in computer vision journals and conference papers.Sajanptl (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Why is OpenMVG listed as implementing Lambda Twist P3P?
I've checked through all the documentation for OpenMVG at https://openmvg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ and Lambda Twist does not appear to be one of the P3P algorithms it implements. Per https://openmvg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/openMVG/multiview/multiview/?highlight=p3p, it implements the algorithms by Kneip and Ke only, unless I'm mistaken. Ethana2 (talk) 05:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)