Talk:Perspectives on capitalism by school of thought

Notation
Wiki style usually recommends that the main version of the page should be capitalized as 'Perspectives on capitalism', rather than 'Perspectives on Capitalism'. I don't know how to change that... would someone take care of it please? Rinconsoleao (talk) 07:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

See also section
It's a bit, ummm, complete. I suspect that several of them are linked in the article (or via templates), and should be removed. Right now it's rather overwhelming. Ravensfire ( talk ) 15:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * For 'several' read thirty-seven. —Tamfang (talk) 02:39, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Looks better, but it's still out of control. You really shouldn't have to use headers in a See Also because of the volume.  There's already the econ sidebar, and I've added the econ footer as well.  Those two should reduce the number of links some more.  Right now there's such a huge number of links in see also that you've really eliminated the usefulness of that section.  Someone's going to see that and skip over it because there's just so much stuff there.  The sidebar/footer should really have most of those, and only a few, critical links stay to related but unlinked articles.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 02:49, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Dang it! Lost an entire post I had typed up.  Grrrr.  I've removed a few more entries from the list, based on the sidebar/footer.  I also removed a few entries (Economics, Business) that are related but in a really, really general way.  I was actually surprised that Economics wasn't linked anywhere in the article.  Various subtopics of it, yup, but the main article?  Surprising!  Hmmm, I wonder if there's a List of influential people or works for economics?  That might be helpful to link to, rather than a long list of individual works/people.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 03:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


 * I think the see also is small enough now, reducing it anymore might actually be unhelpful at this point. I consolidated the columns making it neater and more readable. Financestudent (talk) 01:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

This article needs sections on development economics and labor economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.186.64 (talk) 20:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Maoist and Confucian Perspectives on Capitalism
The absence of a tab on the Moaist or Confucian perspective on capital is glaring, given 1/4th of humanity lived with it. Would appreciate the help of an expert in the field. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology_of_the_Communist_Party_of_China#Economics

I noticed that no one has talked about this article since 2010, nearly a decade ago. It seems dead. Futher, the article itself seems disjointed without a summary providing an overview of the different perspectives on capitalism with their main themes, and instead feel like a list of topics. I could start to work on a proper summary?(Mshara1 (talk) 04:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC))