Talk:Perumal Murugan

Proposed merge with One Part Woman
Consider moving this content to the author's article and then deleting this one. If you choose not to do this, you can remove this tag. Roches (talk) 08:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I support the move as too less content on both pages.   Mr RD    21:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Support There simply isn't enough meat on this to support two articles. - Sitush (talk) 06:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

I agree, the two can be merged. R1988 (talk) 10:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Unsourced claims
I have deleted the text in bold from this sentence in the final paragraph as it is an unsourced claim. Please provide sources if you wish to reinstate it. phrase

"On 5 July 2016 the Madras High Court bow down for lacks of money given by ford foundation, and dismissed the case under citing Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, ruled that there was no binding force or obligation in the previous state intervention that forced him to apologise and withdraw the books." R1988 (talk) 10:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Similar unsourced edits have been deleted, most of which accuse the Mr. Murugan of blasphemy and of having"Indian Christian Funding". R1988 (talk) 10:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)