Talk:Pete Doherty's controversies

September 2007
This page should be incorporated into the main Pete Doherty page. There's no reason to have a separate page to list his failures and foibles.


 * Disagree. Incorporation would unbalance the main article. Ribonucleic 19:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * disagree. cos i can —Preceding unsigned comment added by No, You're A Towel! (talk • contribs) 06:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Disagree, page would be too long. -Elysianfields (talk) 03:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Break in at Carl's Flat
Didn't Pete break into former Libertine bandmate, Carl Barat's flat? Shouldn't that be added? -Elysianfields (talk) 03:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

December 2007
And hey, what about the penguin thing? Can someone add it in? http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=230023 And re: discussion above, well, he *is* just as (actually, more) famous for his 'controversies' as he is for anything else (aka f-in *legendary*), but there's too damn much of it for a useful bio page, so yeah, I'm in favour of it being on a separate page. And someone should flesh it out a bit. This isn't half of what's been newsworthy, which is what makes him so damn amusing. -- A Non. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.154.238.36 (talk) 22:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Merging with Pete Doherty (2)
Oppose: The list is not made out of gossip, but of facts. I think that it is way too long to be merged into Pete Doherty without loosing a substantial part of it. Besides the list will probably only grow with time as many of his legal problems have yet to be resolved.Yamanbaiia (talk) 22:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)