Talk:Peter-assment/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 16:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * All grand. Gave a minor copy-edit but that's it sorted in terms of prose.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * Not a problem with the citations.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * Given that you include some criticism of a joke in the episode, the actual scene should be mentioned in the plot summary or recapped along with the criticism. As is, it's pretty out of context.
 * I'm not sure what you are referring to. If you are referring to the Schiavo joke, it is mentioned in the first sentence of plot. Please explain. Gage (talk) 05:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's it? I sort of assumed the joke would be more offensive than that. Ah well, guess we're complete then. GRAPPLE   X  10:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neutrality seems okay to me.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * History is stable.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * The image of Fisher is commons, no problem there. The rationale for the screenshot seems a bit cursory and boilerplate, though. Try to specify why it's relevant to the episode in question, showing the episode's two main roles in a key plot point.
 * Removed. Gage (talk) 05:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Just going to hold this one for now, shouldn't take long at all to fix the 3A and 6A issues there. GRAPPLE   X  16:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The image of Fisher is commons, no problem there. The rationale for the screenshot seems a bit cursory and boilerplate, though. Try to specify why it's relevant to the episode in question, showing the episode's two main roles in a key plot point.
 * Removed. Gage (talk) 05:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Just going to hold this one for now, shouldn't take long at all to fix the 3A and 6A issues there. GRAPPLE   X  16:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Concerns addressed, article's good to go. Well done! GRAPPLE  X  10:01, 14 December 2011 (UTC)