Talk:Peter Alexander (artist)

Unproven notability
I don't see evidence of this subject's notability in the current content. As it stands I think it is a likely candidate to be nominated for potential deletion. Any views? Peteinterpol (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed, there's nothing here to even make a judgement. tedder (talk) 03:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Photograph
It is good to have a photograph but does anyone out there have one that is better than this? It's not even a clear shot of his face and we just have to take the photographer's word that it is him! Peteinterpol (talk) 16:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Peter Alexander (artist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101101043830/http://isherwoodfoundation.org/advisory_board.htm to http://www.isherwoodfoundation.org/advisory_board.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Once again
As mentioned almost 8 years ago the pic in the infobox is next to useless. You cant see the artist at all. Even when you click on the pic to go to its file page the only thing you can see is some white hair and an eyebrow. It fails almost every guideline for a pic to be used in an article. OTOH since yjr asrticle did get traffic with its main page mention perhaps no readers were bothered by its lack of usefulness. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 05:16, 1 June 2020 (UTC)