Talk:Peter Casey

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:06, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Peter Casey on set of RTE Dragons' Den.jpg

Requested move 27 October 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus for move. Particularly want to note that existence of "Pete Casey" cannot prevent moving this to undisambiguated title. A lot of similar scenarios exist and that's why confused was made. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Peter Casey (businessman) → Peter Casey – On a similar grounds to those in Talk:Gavin Duffy, particularly given the result of the election. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 16:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Support - seems to be currently the most notable person with that name. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Oppose - not more notable than the other Peter Caseys. Also would be confusing with Pete Casey. Spleodrach (talk) 17:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Support - Certainly by far and way the most famous 'Peter Casey' out there. As said previously, I support it on the grounds of the election result and the example of Gavin Duffy. CaneFluteMan (talk) 22:30, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Support, easily the primary topic. All the other Peter Caseys get about 1,000 page views but this person gets about 60,000. Flooded  with them hundreds 16:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Conflict of interest
Hi Bastun,

George here (gmcallister1957). I received a message regarding content i removed. I am unsure why you put it back as I was removing on behalf of Peter Casey. Neither myself or Peter actually put those statements there so Peter wanted them taken out. What I have left is still accurate.

George — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmcallister1957 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)


 * , ah, right. Please read our policy on conflict of interest - specifically this linked section. In short, subjects of articles can't decide what an article says or doesn't say about them.  As you have disclosed a conflict of interest, you shouldn't edit that page directly. You and/or Peter Casey are free to request changes to the article, as outlined at the second link above. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 19:47, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Given recent edits, I've copied the above interaction from my talk page. Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 12:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)