Talk:Peter Edwards (historian)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Will get to this shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead and infobox;
 * Remove the year of the awards, they are just messing up the infobox. The award names are pretty long.
 * I respectfully disagree. While the award names are long, the year of award adds little space-wise and helps track certain periods in Edwards' career. The use here is also consistent with a number of similar articles. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Section 1;
 * 1937–49 -> 1937–1949, per MOS:DATERANGE
 * Is this in reference to the book? If so, the shortened year range is the official title. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Section 2; all good
 * Section 2.1;
 * Crises & Commitments received a somewhat contentious reception
 * I think the qualification is warranted here as the book was not completely contentious, but there was objection to it from some. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * H.T. Priestley -> H. T. Priestley, per MOS:INITIALS
 * Done. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Section 2.2;
 * 1996–98 -> 1996–1998, per MOS:DATERANGE
 * 2002–08 -> 2002–2008
 * Done. Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * 30.6% confidence, but I understand that these are the book titles. Violation unlikely. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Excellent article, very well written. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the review, Krishna. It is much appreciated. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 11:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)