Talk:Peter II (cat)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 14:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

First assessment
First assessment forthcoming. voorts (talk/contributions) 14:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Assessment completed. This passes. If an image of Peter II ever becomes available or a free use photograph of the Cenotaph from the mid-1940s is available, I would change out the current image for either of those, but I'm not going to hold up the GA for a search for images. voorts (talk/contributions) 14:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * Looks good after copy edit.
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Looks good after copy edit.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * Has a reference section. Although archive links are not necessary to meet GA criteria, it is best practice to include archive URLs.
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * Checked all sources except for the book cited, for which I will AGF.
 * c. (OR):
 * No synth.
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Used Earwig's tool.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * As the nominator noted, Peter II was short-lived and I couldn't turn up any additional sources via a search of TWL.
 * b. (focused):
 * Per 3a, the article goes into all of the detail it can.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Checked page history and talk page.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Image copyright is fine.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Caption edited.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Checked page history and talk page.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Image copyright is fine.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Caption edited.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Caption edited.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail: