Talk:Peter Jackson's interpretation of The Lord of the Rings/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 16:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for taking this on. Just to be clear, this article is not a review of Jackson's films (a matter briefly mentioned in the Context section), which everyone pretty much agrees are great, but a report on the specific question of how he has interpreted Tolkien's text. As you know I am used to working with reviewers to discuss and if need be to make changes at any level required to meet the six GA criteria. This article has been carefully researched and is cited in depth, so I hope you find it satisfactory. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

 * Add alt text to every image being used.
 * Done.


 * Remove the comma after "1954–1955".
 * Done.


 * "of landscape and of characters" "of landscape and characters"
 * Done.


 * "roles as hero" - reword
 * Reworded.


 * Remove the comma after "imagery problematic".
 * Done.


 * Remove the comma after "demands".
 * Done.


 * "summmon" - typo?
 * Fixed.


 * Remove the comma after "all to be valid".
 * Done.


 * "story lines" should be written as one word.
 * Done.


 * Shouldn't Via Dolorosa be capitalized?
 * Fixed.


 * Archive sources (you can use this).
 * I've run the bot.

-- all done to date. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:36, 13 July 2021 (UTC)