Talk:Peter Kawalek

cleanup-rewrite template
first i prodded this, but on consideration and a little more checking, found that the guy has an h-index of 12, is borderline notable, and it's just the article that's crap, esp in terms of formatting. i fixed a little spelling, and a little bit of the weird stray images and stuff, but became overwhelmed. it's conceivable that the article would be deleted in an afd, but there seems to be no urgent reason to do that, as i think there is probably a good article to be written about the guy. i'm not the person to do it, though. i just thought i'd mention it here as people do seem to be editing this article a little. &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * well, despite my own expectations about myself, i cleaned this up anyway and then took all the templates off. this doesn't leave much material, and i can't say that i'd have a strong feeling for keeping the article if it came to afd, but i think there's enough of a chance of notability that i will just leave it alone for now.  at least it's visually in good shape at this point. &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 15:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)