Talk:Peter Knecht

Untitled
I don't believe the subject of this article is notable enough to merit a Wikipedia page. In addition, the content of the article seriously violates NPOV; in fact, I would not be surprised if Peter Knecht wrote this article himself. I suggest swift deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.219.44 (talk) 17:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I suspect you're right about the latter, but searching for reliable, secondary sources, I see enough material to establish notability under the WP:GNG. I've taken a knife through a lot of the promotional material, some of which is copied from Knecht's own material as well. But yeah, still needs work.--  j &#9883; e decker  talk  18:07, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)