Talk:Peter McKelvie

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this man has made a set of allegations which has lead to the Home Secretary of the UK commissioning an enquiry into historical Child Abuse. Either Mr McKelvie will be a very important witness or will be determined to be a fraud large enough to justify a major enquiry. --Leonig Mig (talk) 08:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I would hope those with views otherwise would comment on this page. Leonig Mig (talk) 09:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Do not delete the Peter McKelvie section, it contains relevant information for the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.231.99.84 (talk) 09:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Support redirect to Operation Fernbridge. This man was a whistleblower.  He has no inherent notability.  The events themselves, and subsequent inquiries, are certainly notable, and are already dealt with in articles, but this article should be removed per WP:BLP1E and related parts of WP:BLP.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The home office funding of PIE allegations are not covered by Fernbridge or mentioned in that article. Leonig Mig (talk) 10:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * In that case another article needs to be created. But not this one, which is about a private individual.  In any case, there is no reliable secondary source indicating any notability of his letter about the PIE - so I've removed it.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 11:02, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Great job. Here is a link to a reliable secondary source re: the home office issues: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-28187357. Leonig Mig (talk) 11:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. That report should be cited in relevant articles - which may or may not already exist.  (Do we have one yet on the Butler-Sloss Inquiry, for instance?)  But it doesn't justify any mention of it in this article.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:03, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree, when the terms of the Butler-Sloss enquiry are published, a page should be created, and if it includes the Home Office allegations, it could make sense to move the content of this article there. Leonig Mig (talk) 17:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)