Talk:Peter Molydeux

Submit for dyk?
Would definitely pass. It needs to be nominated within 5 days of creation. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , you have my blessing if you want to go for it czar  15:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I submitted it. Good work on the article and I'd definitely entreat you to participate more in the DYK process for future articles you write or improve upon, if you haven't been. It's a good spot check that everything in the article is on track for future steps in the article improvement process, it's a component of WP:FOUR, and I recently discovered that there's a new rule allowing recently promoted GAs to be eligible for DYK. :) Axem Titanium (talk) 22:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , nice work. I've actually done over 100 DYKs—while the recognition is nice, I figured that I preferred to spend the time in other areas. If you ever want to nominate anything I write for DYK, I won't ever object. Perhaps I should bring new articles to WT:VG in the future so others can choose to nominate? czar  22:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem, I wasn't sure since I didn't see any in my (brief) perusal of your bio. That would certainly help; I suppose User:Salavat's new article announcements at WT:VG serve a similar purpose and might or might not have caught this particular article. Thinking about it, it's tough because on the one hand, participating in this aspect of encyclopedia building (i.e. new article exposure on the main page, helps people see it and know it exists to improve it) sounds important in and of itself, and on the other hand, it takes time away from actually improving the article, especially because the DYK process has a time cost to it. A difficult dilemma. Axem Titanium (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)