Talk:Peter Sloly

Edits being Removed
All references to the current political situation or previous ones involving Peter Sloly are being removed, including those that are entirely neutral. Given the warning about the article being edited by someone with a close connection to Peter Sloly, I am naturally concerned about the objectivity of these edits. 207.228.88.114 (talk) 15:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:RS, WP:V and WP:BLP apply. Where are the reliable sources, where is the relevant neutral content? GiantSnowman 16:10, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

You're gonna call putting a hat on a statue 'desecration' of monuments? There was no destruction. What complete BullShit! You need to lock this page because that's the only way you can spread your lies and disinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:4880:E440:397C:59EC:2F2C:6F6 (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Nothing was "desecrated"
The two articles referenced are long ago obsolete and this has been debunked by many media. But we know that truth and NPOV are hard to come by these days in Wikipedia. I'd edit it, but I know it would get reverted each time by the overlords. Canadian media is government subsidised. To consider most Canadian media "neutral sources" is really to not understand the bigger media context in the country. That sentence should be removed. Stick to the facts relevant to Mr Sloly.--Tallard (talk) 04:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Feel free to suggest alternative sources/wording here. GiantSnowman 08:26, 19 February 2022 (UTC)