Talk:Peter the Patrician/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hello! I am starting rewieving this! I think the articles has good chances. Buchraeumer (talk) 20:35, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

A good article is&mdash;  : : : . . :  The article is not very long, but absolutely comprehensive enough for GA. I corrected one typo and in one instance made several shorter sentences out of one. Now it is perfectly understandable. It is a nice article, a very intersting topic and fun to read! PASSED! Buchraeumer (talk) 21:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ; and
 * (c).
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).
 * All right! Thanks for the review and the edits! Constantine  ✍  04:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)