Talk:Petergeist/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: J Milburn (talk) 23:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * "from season four of" Link to season article/list?
 * Links to go with character names?
 * "Indian" is a bit ambiguous. In any case, Native American would be more accurate.
 * "As a result, a poltergeist haunts the Griffins' house and spirits drag Stewie away to the other side, followed by even stranger events. ." A bit too adverty. Also double fullstop.
 * "started" typo...
 * Odd capitalisation in the gueststar section of the infobox.

As I say, the above bullets are by no means the only issue. There's just too much to be done with this article to place it on hold. If, once you've dealt with my comments, you resubmit, feel free to leave a message on my talk page and I'll review it as soon as possible. Alternatively, I understand if you would prefer for another reviewer to take a look, but you would have to wait. I am also happy to offer further advice/explanation regarding this article and this review- again, feel free to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 23:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)